British History

HomeCFPsResourcesWhat's Going on?News & ReviewsAbout Me

Call For Papers

A-L    M-R     S-Z


The 20th- and 21st-Century Irish Literatures: Between Realism and Experimentation
HJEAS (Hungarian Journal of English and American Studies) seeks essay submissions for a thematic section of a 2019 issue on “The 20th and 21st Century Irish Literatures between Realism and Experimentation.” HJEAS is a peer-reviewed journal of the Institute of English and American Studies, University of Debrecen, Hungary, publishing critical articles and book reviews in the fields of American, British, Canadian, and Irish literature, history, and culture, and is available from JSTOR and ProQuest. (www.hjeas.unideb.hu)

The tension between realism and experimentation has marked the development of modern Irish literature, being intrinsic to the work of a number of major Irish writers. Often regarded as a father-figure of all experimental writing, James Joyce was attacked by as different commentators as Lukács and Pound for the scope and radicalness of experiment, particularly in Finnegans Wake. Joyce himself considered his work to be firmly set in the realist tradition. At a time when he was yet to publish his first collection of lyrics, W. B. Yeats was encouraged by his father to write realist prose, which may eventually have contributed to his abhorrence of realism in favour of ever more daring experimentation in verse writing. Nonetheless, Yeats’s poetry is packed full of amazingly realist portrayals of the world about him. J. M. Synge may have worked in a realist mode but his implementation of vernacular Aran speech paved the way for the linguistic experimentation of the following generations of Irish (also English-language) playwrights.

Modern Irish literature may seem to be a field of vacillators (whether conscious or not remains to be investigated) who employ traditional genres and modes of writing, while at the same time, almost instinctively, seeking to supersede conventions. Sometimes this happens tacitly, by pushing the boundaries of expressiveness a little further, like with Synge. Occasionally the revolt engulfs conventions in flames in which new means of expression are forged, as is the case in Joyce.

Papers may include but are in no way limited to:
  • Realist and experimental modes in high modernism and onwards
  • Experimental literature today and a century ago: continuity and change
  • Revisions of the realist mode in contemporary Irish literatures
  • Ethics and aesthetics of realist and/or experimental literature
  • The great masters’ (stifling/enabling) influences
  • Contemporary realisms (including magical realism)
  • Voices from the margin (social, cultural, racial, etc.) and the conventions and aesthetics they have embraced or created
  • Cosmopolitanism vs. parochialism – openness and resistance to foreign trends
  • Irish literature and globalization (e.g., realism and experimentation in literary responses to global traumas, literature and the new media, literature and migration, etc.)
  • The aesthetics of nostalgia and futurity


Completed manuscripts of 5,000-10,000 words must follow the MLA parenthetical citation with Works Cited. Please follow the HJEAS Style Sheet available here

Proposals of 500 words with a 100-150 bio are due by February 15, 2018. Final papers are due by July 15, 2018. Please send the submissions and all inquiries to the guest editors, Wit Pietrzak and Katarzyna Ojrzyńska 

Contact Info: 
Hungarian Journal of English and American Studies

Contact EmailURL




Abortion in the British Isles, France and North America since 1800
International Conference organised by the University of Paris-Sorbonne (France), 6-8 November 2018.
Conveners: Claire Charlot, Adrien Lherm (Paris-Sorbonne, HDEA EA 4086), and Fabienne Portier-Le Cocq (University François Rabelais, Tours, ICD EA 6297).

Around the world, 2018 will mark the anniversary of a series of events relating to the decriminalisation of abortion: the enforcement of the UK Abortion Act 1967 (50 years), the US Supreme Court ruling of Roe vs. Wade (45 years), and the Canada Supreme Court ruling of R. v. Morgentaler (25 years). The Republic of Ireland is also planning a referendum on the possible repeal of Article 8 of its Constitution which, if approved, would lead to the decriminalisation of abortion there too. In addition, shortly after the British General Election of 2017, Prime Minister, Theresa May, announced that women from Northern Ireland (currently excluded from the British Abortion Act) would be allowed to travel to mainland Britain to secure an abortion on the National Health Service.

Over the years, some countries have authorised abortion on therapeutic grounds (when the physical and mental health of the mother or health of the foetus is at risk), and sometimes extended terminations to other grounds such as birth control or the right of women to take control over their bodies. In this instance, the context provided by the 1960s and the 1970s would prove decisive in the liberalisation of legislation; a move described by some as ‘permissive’ and by others as ‘progressive’. A reform of the laws on contraception often pre-dated the legalisation of abortion, helping to shape a context in which women sought greater freedom from child-bearing.

However, despite changes in attitudes and legal frameworks, the abortion debate goes on and many attempts have been and are still being made to turn the clock back. This can take various forms: street protests, physical violence (including assault and shootings), legal challenges, and demands for amendment or repeal of existing legislation from anti-abortion lobbies and political movements or parties created for the sole purpose of going back to a world without legally-available abortion.

The aim of this conference will be to consider all these developments in France and in the UK, Ireland, Canada and the United States, and to seek to explain how debate, the Law, as well as the situation on the ground, have changed over the last two centuries in the different countries concerned. Among the possible topics of interest for the conference are: a) quantifying abortions and relating the phenomenon to that of statistical knowledge; b) charting the evolution of the legislation or rulings which led to the criminalisation and then the decriminalisation of abortion; c) examining the social status of women affected by those changes in the countries concerned; d) describing and explaining changes in attitudes among the various actors involved: public opinion, the medical profession, politicians, members of the different churches, journalists, the activists of the different movements or political parties and of course women themselves; e) exploring the sociological profiles of women who seek abortions.

Such topics raise a number of key questions. Is abortion used today as a method of birth control? Can we speak of abortion on demand? Can we speak of a backlash against abortion? Such questions, it is hoped, will contribute to an interdisciplinary discussion among conference participants concerning the issues raised by abortion.

Proposals for papers on one of these topics – or others – are invited either in French or English, and may address only one aspect of the abortion question at a national level, or adopt a comparative approach. We hope to attract specialists from a wide variety of fields: bioethics, demography, law, religious studies, economics, history, medical studies, philosophy, sociology, political science, and so on.

Please send a proposal (a 500-word abstract and a short CV) to each of the three organisers: Claire CharlotAdrien Lherm and Fabienne Portier-Le Cocq. The deadline is 23rd December 2017. Those submitting a proposal will be informed before the New Year whether their paper has been accepted. Some papers will be published. A registration fee will be asked of participants.

Scientific committee: Nathalie Bajos (INSERM, France), Françoise Barret-Ducrocq (Paris-Diderot, France), Claire Charlot (Paris-Sorbonne, France), Ann Furedi (Bpas, United Kingdom), Hélène Harter (Rennes 2, France), Françoise Le Jeune (Nantes, France), Adrien Lherm (Paris-Sorbonne, France), Janine Mossuz-Lavau (CNRS, CEVIPOF), Fabienne Portier-Le Cocq (Tours, France), Joshua C. Wilson (Denver, USA).





Aesthetic Heteronomy: Beyond Autonomy in British and German Eighteenth-century Tradition
The eighteenth century is traditionally regarded as the grand siècle of modern aesthetic autonomy. A longstanding diachronic narrative holds that such autonomy originated in early British eighteenth-century theories on disinterestedness and was subsequently realized by the German Romantics. This anthology aims to reassess the validity of such a narrative by mapping the intellectual topography of the aesthetic heteronomy that distinguished British and German eighteenth-century discourse on aesthetic concepts. The contributions in the anthology are transdisciplinary in their focus on how European philosophers and critics inscribed the aesthetic experience of works of art and nature in discourses on political society and natural science. 

The anthology is divided into three intersecting parts:

  • Part I explores the role of the third Earl of Shaftesbury and other British men of letters (e.g. Addison, Hutcheson, and Dennis) in their ambition to incorporate ethico-theological ideas on disinterestedness and works of art as organic wholes, in an ongoing debate about modern political society.
  • Part II addresses the impact of early eighteenth-century British thought on German Aufklärung and Neoclassicism (e.g. Baumgarten, Winckelmann, Kant, and Goethe), and the wish to pursue and alter the British legacy by introducing scientific, ethical, and pedagogical conceptions of the relation between man and organic nature.
  • Part III examines the Romantic and Idealist effort (e.g. Hölderlin, Friedrich Schlegel, Schelling, Hegel, Wordsworth, and Coleridge) to develop the analogy between aesthetic concepts and organism into a new model of ideal society by criticizing a mechanistic conception of nature in natural science.

The anthology is part of the major ongoing research project Reassessing the Rise of Aesthetics. Aesthetic Heteronomy from Shaftesbury to Schelling, funded by Riksbankens Jubileumsfond (RJ), between 2017 and 2020. The project is administered by Södertörn University in Stockholm. The aim is to have the anthology published by an international university/academic press during 2019. The anthology targets undergraduates, postgraduates, academics, and advanced researchers studying British and German eighteenth-century aesthetics, philosophy, literature, music, and art. It is also written to appeal to anyone with a more general interest in the ‘Long Eighteenth Century’ and to worldwide societies for eighteenth-century studies. Current research on the rise of aesthetics in the eighteenth century is undergoing major revisions. While this anthology is intended to contribute to the ongoing re-evaluation of the birth of modern aesthetics, it also aims to fill a particular gap by bringing aesthetics into dialogue with eighteenth-century philosophy, natural science, and literature.

Submissions should be no longer than 7,500 words. Abstracts should be no longer than 150 words. Abstracts are due by 1 December, 2017. Please send your abstract (as a Word document) and CV to the following email address here.

For further information about the research project, please visit this website.

The volume is edited by
  • Mattias Pirholt, Associate Professor, School of Culture and Education, Södertörn University
  • Karl Axelsson, PhD, School of Culture and Education, Södertörn University
  • Camilla Flodin, PhD, Department of Gender Studies, Uppsala University

Contact Info: 
Mattias Pirholt

URL




Britain and the World Conference, Exeter, June 2018.
After our tenth anniversary conference in Austin in April 2017, Britain and the World returns to the UK for 2018: Thursday 21 to Saturday 23 June. It will be at Exeter University: the venue is Reed Hall and accommodation is at the neighbouring Holland Hall, and, as always, the conference is concerned with interactions within the 'British world' from the beginning of the seventeenth century to the present and will highlight the importance of transnational perspectives.

The Keynote Speaker will be Professor Richard Overy (Exeter), and the Plenary Speaker is Professor Audrey Horning (Queen’s University Belfast). There’ll be lunchtime roundtables on cinema and history, and on public history. Publishers present will include our journal publisher Edinburgh University Press, and our book series publisher Palgrave Macmillan, and the commissioning editor will be present throughout to discuss your publishing plans.

We accept both individual twenty-minute papers and complete panel submissions. Panels are expected to consist of three papers and should be submitted by one person who is willing to serve as the point of contact. Complete panels should also include a chair. In addition to abstracts for each individual paper, panel submissions should also include a 100-150 word introduction describing the panel’s main theme. The conference does not discriminate between panels and individual paper submissions, nor between graduate students and established academics.

As ever the conference icebreaker will be held on the Thursday evening, the Dinner Party on the Friday, and the outings downtown on the Saturday. These events will provide numerous opportunities for networking and more in the capital of Devon.

Exeter is two hours by direct train from London, and there is a direct National Express bus line from Heathrow Airport. Exeter also has its own international airport, and is one hour by train from Bristol.

On campus is the Bill Douglas Cinema Museum, home to one of the largest collections in Britain of material relating to film. The University’s special collections are noted for archives relating to twentieth-century South West Writing (and include the papers of Daphne du Maurier), literature and visual culture, Victorian culture and imperial endeavour, Arab and Islamic studies, and religious and parish book collections. In city centre there are Exeter Cathedral and archives, the Devon and Exeter Institute (which houses a large collection of local archival materials), Exeter Castle, and the Royal Albert Memorial Museum (RAMM).

There are two rates, for those waged and unwaged. The rates cover everything: registration (including a rolling membership which includes subscription to Britain and the World journal), three nights’ single en-suite room and breakfast, refreshments throughout the day, lunch on all three days, and dinner on Thursday and Friday.

$615/£465 Waged
$515/£385 Unwaged

We have 100 rooms booked for the evenings of Wed, Thur, Fri, and 50 for Saturday, so please let us know if you’d like a fourth night’s bed and breakfast.

Individual registration rates (excluding lodging and dinner) are also available and will be posted shortly.

We’d like to stress that Britain and the World is a non-profit organisation; all proceeds are spent on the conference. The conference venue and accommodation have been chosen for their convenience and because each is situated in one of the UK’s most beautiful campuses. We think this will be a unique conference experience.

All submissions for inclusion in the conference should be received by Friday, 15 December 2017, with decisions on inclusion announced on Monday, 8 January 2018. Submissions should be made by email. Please submit all information in the body of your email (no attachments or PDFs, thank you!) and in the following order: name, affiliation, email, paper title, abstract, keywords.

Updates regarding the conference will periodically be posted on the Society website. It is hoped that participants will be able to call upon their departments for hotel and transportation expenses as the conference is not able to offer financial support.

On Twitter our @britishscholar hashtag is #BATW2018. Registration for the Conference will open on Monday 5 February 2018. If you have any questions about the conference, please contact the Conference Organizing Committee directly.

Contact Info: 
Michelle D. Brock, Washington & Lee University
Deputy Editor/Conference Committee, Britain and the World (The British Scholar Society)

Contact EmailURL





British Jewish Contemporary Cultures: An International Conference
26-27 March 2018, Bangor University, Wales.

We invite proposals for the first international British Academy funded conference on British Jewish Contemporary Cultures. Any topic which explores the study of contemporary British Jewish culture, widely defined, is welcomed. We are particularly interested in locating British Jewish contemporary cultures in global and comparative settings, as well as in terms of imperial, postcolonial and transnational narratives. The aim of the conference is to tease out the tension between a transcultural British Jewish Studies and the specificity of the Jewish experience in Britain with increasing theoretical and methodological complexity.

We welcome proposals for panel discussions as well as individual papers of 20 minutes. Please send an abstract of no more than 300 words and a brief biography to Jennifer Griffiths by 1st December 2017.

Suggested topics include but are by no means limited to:
  • Writing British Jewishness
  • Images of British Jewishness in film and television
  • Gender, sexuality and Jewishness in contemporary culture
  • Visual images (art, cartoons, graphic novels)
  • British Jews and the media
  • Shifting Identities: Transcultural contexts
  • Performing Jewishness
  • British Jewishness and the Holocaust
  • Politics and Jewishness in contemporary Britain
  • Locating British Jewishness: space and place
  • The Jewish Gothic
  • British Jews and Israel/Palestine
  • Black and British Jewish Intersections
  • Antisemitism
  • Brexit and Contemporary British Jewish culture

Conference organisers: Professor Nathan Abrams (Bangor) and Dr. Ruth Gilbert (Winchester). The conference has been generously supported by the British Academy.

For more information on the British Jewish Contemporary Cultures Network, please visit the website or contact j.c.griffiths@bangor.ac.uk





British Literature and Sociology, 1838-1910
Though Émile Durkheim, Max Weber, and Georg Simmel are generally regarded as the “founders” of sociology as a discipline, sociological theory was actually rooted in nineteenth-century culture as intellectuals and scientists attempted to make sense of the political, economic, and social dislocations brought about by the Industrial and French Revolutions. Auguste Comte (who coined the term “la sociologie” in 1838), John Stuart Mill, Harriet Martineau, George Henry Lewes, Karl Marx, Henry Mayhew, Herbert Spencer, and Charles Booth were among the primary exponents of “the scientific study of society” during the Victorian era; significantly, their work often responded to or was informed by myriad literary authors and forms.

This volume represents the first collection of essays to illuminate the historically and intellectually complex relationship between literary studies and sociology in nineteenth and early twentieth-century Britain. As Samuel Kerkham Ratcliffe noted in a December 1909 paper read before London’s Sociological Society, “Sociology and the English Novel,” the “difficulty is not to discover sociology in fiction, but to find anything therein that is without sociological value and meaning.” This point has been more recently amplified by Wolf Lepenies, in Between Literature and Science: The Rise of Sociology, and Krishna Kumar, in “Sociology and the Englishness of English Social Theory,” who both have sought to account for Britain’s relatively slow professionalization of sociology before 1950 by citing the fact that “for the English their poets, novelists, and literary critics seemed to be doing a more than adequate job of analysis and criticism of the novel problems of nineteenth-century industrial society” (Kumar 55). With these observations in mind, we invite essays that will help to address some key questions. How, precisely, did Victorian and Edwardian literary texts did help to develop and formalize the discipline of sociology? How did emergent sociological discourses and practices shape the literature of the nineteenth- and early-twentieth century? To what degree were literature and sociology offering competing systems for analyzing the society they purported to represent?

We welcome papers that consider the sociological provenance of specific Victorian and Edwardian cultural objects and practices or papers that explore how various social theories and theorists were inherently tethered to or inspired by the literary. We especially encourage submissions that explore problems in and of the social through the “contact zones” of literary studies and sociology. Essays might examine one or more specific examples of “the scientific study of society” and consider the degree to which these proto-sociological texts are themselves amenable to rhetorical, ideological, formal, historical or other permutations of “literary” analysis. Contributors might discuss how specific literary works represent persons, institutions, or methods of thought associated with sociological theory and practice, and/or whether such literary works contributed to an emergent sociological discourse (or discourses). We also invite papers that explore how nineteenth- and early-twentieth century literary texts contributed to the expansion of sociology as a discipline and/or anticipated the later theoretical interventions of Erving Goffman, Pierre Bourdieu, Anthony Giddens, etc. In addition, sociological accounts of the role of literature in the formation of national identities, classes, or class fractions in Victorian or Edwardian England would be welcome. This list is meant to be suggestive rather than exhaustive.

We are currently soliciting proposals (300-500 words, plus one-page CV) for essays of roughly 6000-8000 words. Proposals should be sent by or before December 15, 2017.

Maria K. Bachman, Professor and Chair
Department of English
Middle Tennessee State University  

Albert D. Pionke, Professor
Department of English
University of Alabama

Contact Email




Comparative perspectives on regulating age of consent and child-marriage in the British Empire, 1880 to 1930
This is a call for proposals for a one-day interdisciplinary conference to be held on 15 June 2018 at SOAS University of London. The conference aims to explore the debates that led to the reform of age of consent laws around the British Empire during the years 1880 to 1930. We are particularly interested in exploring the issues of age of consent and child marriage through interdisciplinary and comparative perspectives in law and history.

Intertwined within these debates are notions of gender, women’s rights, biology, and attempts to understand the native psyche. These compete with tropes of cultural relativism, orientalism, the female victim, and the white man’s burden amongst other concerns. For the purpose of this conference, consent is interpreted widely to include physical and intellectual consent to sexual activities as well as marriage. The conference aims to bring together the growing number of scholars who are currently working on the histories of age of consent in the British Empire.

Recognising that the development and history of the age of consent debate is transnational, international, and multi-layered one, the conference is conceived of as a starting point for forming an international network of scholars working in the area.

Themes of the conference include but are not limited to:
  • Notions of consent – physical and/or intellectual
  • Age of consent campaigns and national movements
  • Religion / class / region based perspectives on consent
  • Comparative or regional studies on age of consent/marriage
  • Age of consent for males
  • Consent, female body, and nationalism/imperialism

Bursaries might be available for PG students.

Please send a 300-word abstract with a short bio. The deadline is 08 January 2018.

Contact Info: 
Dr Kanika Sharma (SOAS University of London) and Dr Laura Lammasniemi (Anglia Ruskin University)

Contact Email: 
ageofconsentsoas@gmail.com






Elizabeth I: The Armada and Beyond, 1588 to 2018
Queen’s House Conference 2018, Greenwich
19–21 April 2018

In September 2016, Royal Museums Greenwich acquired the Armada Portrait of Elizabeth I. This
remarkable work of art has captured widespread attention from its creation until the present day,
providing a defining image of what has come to be seen as a critical moment in history: the failed
invasion of England by the Spanish Armada in the summer of 1588. This conference will address this
moment in time and its consequences both for Elizabeth and her subjects in the immediate aftermath of
the Armada and for subsequent generations, as the idea of the Virgin Queen and her great triumph has
been shaped and remade throughout history until the present day.

While the image was inspired by a specific event, its complex symbolism embraces issues of monarchy,
dynasty, nation and empire in the early modern period. It was designed to be a spectacle of female
power and majesty, carefully calibrated to inspire awe and wonder, an impression which has lasted to
the present day. Scholars have described the portrait as a definitive representation of the English
Renaissance, encapsulating the creativity, ideals and ambitions of the entire Elizabethan era. Equally the
portrait has inspired and informed countless representations of Elizabeth I in the visual and performing
arts, and across film, theatre and television. It has thus been instrumental in making her one of the most
recognizable historical figures for audiences today.

Elizabeth’s apparently impressive military record against the forces of tyranny and popery, affirmed
through such imagery as the Armada Portrait, became the standard by which her successors were
judged. As the seventeenth century progressed, the myth of ‘Good Queen Bess’, ‘Gloriana’ and the
Elizabethan ‘Golden Age’ took hold. At the same time, the idea of 1588 as the moment when Britain
began its rise as a major naval and imperial power established itself. The 1588 Armada became
synonymous with the menace of invasion and despotism, and victory came to signal a bright future of
English/British liberty and ascendancy. Today, Elizabeth continues to be claimed as a role model for
politicians and others seeking to associate themselves with the values that she is seen to represent.
This conference will mark the conservation and re-display of the Armada Portrait at the Queen’s House,
the last remaining building of Greenwich Palace, the birthplace of Elizabeth I and a major royal site for
the Tudor and Stuart dynasties. The Queen’s House and the collections of Royal Museums Greenwich
offer the potential to unpack a range of meanings and contexts for the image, including the domestic
and international worlds of the Renaissance period and the resonance of the Spanish Armada within
history to the present day. It is hoped that this conference will pick up on these themes, advancing our
understanding of the Armada Portrait specifically and Elizabeth I more generally, interrogating popular
notions associated with her life and reputation, offering fresh and alternative perspectives.

Some of the themes that might be considered include (but are not limited to):

• Female power and authority
• Female monarchs and consorts as war leaders
• Court culture and patronage post-1588
• Relations with Protestant Europe and reputation as a Protestant heroine
• Her role during and after the Spanish Armada
• Elizabeth in the public eye
• Commemorations of 1588 in Elizabethan culture and beyond
• Relations with the Islamic World, 1588–1603
• Trade and Empire, East and West
• Elizabeth and her biographers
• Representations in historical genre paintings
• Characterizations in film, fiction, opera and theatre
• The reputation of Elizabeth, home and abroad, from 1588 to the present day

We invite submission of abstracts (300 to 400 words) for twenty-minute papers. The deadline fosubmissions is 1 December 2017. Please direct queries, if any, to Janet Dickinson or Christine Riding  and submit proposals and a brief biography here.

Convenors: Robert Blyth, Christine Riding (Royal Museums Greenwich) and Janet Dickinson (University
of Oxford). The conference is hosted by the Royal Museums Greenwich in association with the Society
for Court Studies



Forgery and Imitation
Victorian Network is an open-access, MLA-indexed, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing and promoting the best work across the broad field of Victorian Studies by postgraduate students and early career academics. We are delighted to announce that our twelfth issue (Summer 2018) will be guest edited by Aviva Briefel on the theme of Forgery and Imitation

Recent scholarship has drawn attention to the increase in art and literary forgery in the nineteenth century, and to the preoccupation with themes of illicit imitation in the Victorian cultural zeitgeist. Critics have highlighted the manifold, intricate, and sometimes surprising ways in which forgery was woven into the social and cultural fabric of the era. The forged, the fake, and the imitative became pressing issues for artistic reproduction as growing demand and changing technology shaped the way in which texts, images, and objects circulated. The spectrum encompassed forged and imitative objects faked with criminal intent, as well as cultural and economic productivity.

Anxieties surrounding the concepts of originality and fakery also permeated nineteenth-century discussions of social authenticity – did forging an identity in a changing world open the door to faking social class, race, or gender? Did cleaving closely to imitate cultural peers maintain the status quo, mask individual dishonesty, or constitute plagiarism? Frauds, cheats, liars, and copycats of every ilk caught the public imagination. The range of depictions was broad and ambivalent. From villainous cheats like Count Fosco to romantic depictions of Chatterton, forgery and imitation marked for the Victorians a point of uneasiness that called for intricate negotiation. Furthermore, as channels of patronage and influence became increasingly fragmented, new ways of conceptualising artistic indebtedness were required. Here, too, forgery and imitation did moral battle. Appropriation, pastiche, and homage had their dark doubles: deceit, plagiarism, and hack work. Navigating intertextuality meant gauging where boundaries of influence could be crossed and where they should be policed.

We invite submissions of approximately 7,000 words on any aspect of the theme in Victorian literature and culture. Possible topics include, but are by no means limited to:

  • Fakery and cultural identity, the (cultural and/or economic) value of forgeries and imitations
  • Fakes as cultural participation 
  • Identities of forgery and forged identities (individual, cultural/national)
  • Illegitimacy, genealogy, and heredity theory
  • Imitation in nature and evolutionary or scientific theory
  • Artistic reproduction (eg. photographs, prints, and casts), copying, and forgery: the original versus the copy
  • Forgery and imitation as gendered activities 
  • Public persona: masks and makeup
  • Fashions, trends, and crazes
  • Acting as imitation; theatricality versus authenticity 
  • Fraud, counterfeit money, financial corruption, white-collar crime 
  • The forgery of memory; history-writing; misremembrance
  • Originality, the Romantic genius, and Victorian imitation 
  • Imitation as literary practice: (mis-)quotation, adaptation, plagiarism, piracy 
  • Literature as imitation: re-creating other mediums in words (ut pictura poesis)
  • Imitating the Victorians: the re-creation of Victorian texts in neo-Victorian writing and fan cultures

All submissions should conform to MHRA house style and the in-house submission guidelines. Submissions should be received by 15 December 2017.





Fraud and Forgery in Literature of the Long Nineteenth Century
Abstract deadline: 15 January 2018
Conference dates: 22-23 June 2018
Aarhus University, Denmark

Keynote speakers:
Dr. James Taylor, Lancaster University:
‘How to get rich quick: Financial advice in nineteenth-century Britain’

Professor Nick Groom, University of Exeter:
‘How much blood and horror lies behind all “good things”!’: Vampiric Authenticity and Catachthonic Forgery in the Long Nineteenth Century

“The beginning of financial crime is the attempt to make an appearance which the legitimate resources of the adventurer in the game of fortune will not justify. Other resources must, therefore, be found, and thus fraud, forgery, and misappropriation are called into existence, with all their frightful and heavy legal responsibilities.”
D. Morier Evans, Facts, Failures and Frauds (1859)

Literature from the long nineteenth century abounds in acts of fraud and forgery, whose far-reaching implications captured the popular imagination during this period of rapid economic development and offered a means of engaging with the unstable realities of a burgeoning capitalist and industrial era. Sara Malton points out that forgery ‘enacts a violation on several fronts: it signifies a transgression against property, identity, the authority of law, the nation-state, and the economic system’. Acts of fraud and forgery are more than simply crimes of mendacity; they destabilise and jeopardise the intertwined systems upon which society is founded. Writers and readers were simultaneously alarmed and fascinated by such acts, which became elemental to new plots but also raised unsettling questions about origins, authority, and the nature of wealth and merit.

Acts of textual forgery frustrate the continuity between text and truth, signifier and signified, with the popularity of object or ‘it-narratives’ complicating these dichotomies even further, and the deployment of pseudonyms by authors problematising the question of authority and the fluid transmission of texts. Authors of this period also implicated the body in acts of forgery, with disguise and false identity common themes in nineteenth-century sensation fiction and often linked with acts of monetary falseness. Novelistic realism, and its strange claim on reality, is intimately entangled with the vocabulary of counterfeiting: plausible worlds minted on the flat ontology of words. Many financial protagonists in Balzac, Dickens, Trollope, and Zola combine financial success with loose dealings in disguises and words, and become symbols of economic categories in turmoil. Before this, romantic poetry participated in debates about bullion and the gold standard, absorbing it into larger discussions of language, nature and truth, and speculative economies – often thinly veiled frauds themselves – further contributed to the nebulous nature of ‘paper wealth’ during the period. Romantic fraud and forgery also surface, with bigamy and false vows appearing in popular texts such as Jane Eyre and Jude the Obscure.

This conference will consider representations of fraud and forgery in all areas of literature from the long nineteenth century (1789-1914), from its deployment as theme to its entanglement with the processes of literary production themselves. Following the recent financial crisis and contemporary concerns over ‘fake news’ and ‘alternative facts’, consideration of the complex slippages between text and reality, money and value, are more urgent than ever, and for this reason we also encourage papers on contemporary neo-Victorian works and the reimagining of Victoriana through the prism of modern concerns with truth and representation.

We welcome proposals for 20 minute papers, or panels of three papers, on topics that can include, but are not limited to:
  • The body: disguise; mistaken identity; the signature; impersonation; evidence of the senses; the body as text; misleading the senses; the body as evidence; sexual fraud and forgery
  • The child: illegitimate children; fraud and forgery in children’s literature; the child as forged ‘text’; children and trickery; child fraudsters
  • Love and marriage: bigamy; polygamy; fraudulent marriage contracts or vows; marital falsehoods; inheritance and the ‘marriage market’
  • Death: fraudulent deaths; death and authority; inheritance
  • Politics: political fraud and forgery; acts of censorship; mendacious politicians; political satire
  • Gender: cross-dressing; the gendering of fraud; gendered susceptibility to fraud and forgery
  • The spiritual and supernatural: spiritualism as fraud; the legitimacy of supernatural phenomena; spiritual means of divining ‘truth’; religion as moral economy; discursive overlap between religious ideas and the semantics of finance
  • Financial fraud and forgery: speculation; gambling; relationship between financial writing and fiction; ideas of credit; paper money and the gold standard; financial bubbles and joint stock companies
  • Genres and authorship: poetry and the poetics of monetary meaning; the authority of fiction; periodicals and authorship; financial narratives and ‘it-narratives’; pseudonyms
  • Paratexts: images and documents as evidence in literary narratives; maps; forged documents
  • Neo-Victorian and other anachronistic narratives: imitations of Victorian style and genre; adaptations or dramatisations of Victorian works

Please send proposals of no more than 300 words and a 50 word biography in Word format by 15 January 2018 to Dr. Elly McCausland and Jakob Gaardbo Nielsen here.

We hope to be able to offer a limited number of travel bursaries for postgraduates and early career researchers; further details will be available after the deadline for submissions.

Contact Info: 
For practical questions: Jakob Gaardbo Nielsen, PhD fellow at the School of Communication and Culture (dept. of comparative literature), Aarhus University, Denmark.






“An island at the center of the world”: Reconsidering Ireland’s Role on the Global Stage
6th Annual Dean Hopper Conference, Drew University
Madison, New Jersey
April 20 and 21, 2018

Taoiseach Leo Varadkar’s recent interview in Time magazine concluded with an optimistic and historically loaded statement: “Geographically, we are at the periphery of Europe, but I don't see Ireland in that way...The way I see us is as an island at the center of the world.” Varadkar’s quote contains echoes of the historiography of empire, which, particularly in the postcolonial era, has brought about intellectual frameworks of core and periphery, hubs and spokes. Barry McCrea’s Languages of the Night (2015) questions exactly this sort of binary. McCrea’s book offers insight into experiential commonalities amongst a number of European linguistic territories, including Brittany and Provence in France, Catalonia and Basque Country in Spain, as well as others, proving that continental Europe itself is also fractured with regional distinctions that cannot be juxtaposed against its neighboring islands as a homogenoustotality. As Varadkar and McCrea make clear, today’s thinkers in both the political and academic realms are more concerned than ever with Ireland’s continuously evolving relationship to both Europe and the wider world. This concept is further complicated by Ireland’s longstanding historical engagement with its own diaspora, as is exemplified by the statement of then-Minister for Enterprise, Mary Harney in 2000. Speaking to a meeting of the American Bar Association, she noted “geographically, we are closer to Berlin than Boston. Spiritually, we are probably a lot closer to Boston than Berlin.”

Drew University’s 6th Annual Dean Hopper Conference aims to examine these historical, cultural, and political connections, while expanding conversations surrounding Ireland’s role on the international stage in the 20th and 21st centuries. This conference aims to engage issues of spatiality through concepts of peripheries, diasporas, and their related power structures in Ireland and abroad. Related papers from all disciplines are welcomed in Irish or English.

Suggested topics and disciplines may include but are not limited to:

  • Space and place
  • Spatial analysis (in history, literature, poetry, etc.)
  • Irish regional identities
  • Modern Irish Literature
  • Diaspora Studies  
  • Ireland and the EU
  • Irish social and political engagement with Trump’s America
  • “Town Twinning”, “Partner Towns”, and “Sister Cities”
  • Irish Language Rights and the Irish Language Abroad
  • Irish Nationalism
  • Ireland and post-colonialism
  • Comparative histories
  • Pre- and Post-Brexit Policy
  • Northern Irish Political Policy
  • The Belfast Agreement: 20 year perspective
  • Immigrants, emigrants, refugees, and asylum seekers
  • Literature and Poetry of the Troubles
  • Irish Poetic and Narrative Traditions
  • Maintenance of Music and Visual Arts Across Place
  • Nua-Litríocht na Gaeilge agus an Diaspóra Éireannaigh
  • Litríocht na himirce
  • An Litríochta Trasnáisiúnta/ An Tairseachúlacht
  • Litríocht náisiúnta agust litríocht mionlaigh
  • Scríobhneoirí ar deoraíocht
  • An chathair mar thairseach
  • Scríbhneoirí idir dhá chultúr

Please send a 250 word abstract and 100 word biography to Rebecca Van Horn or Patrick J. Mahony at hopper@drew.edu by 15 Jan. 2018






Literature, Education and the Sciences of the Mind in Britain and America, 1850-1950
University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
17-18 July, 2018  
Keynote Speakers:Professor Helen Small, Pembroke College, University of Oxford
Professor Priscilla Wald, Duke University

This conference aims to stimulate a wide-ranging discussion about the interactions between British and American literature, education, and the sciences of the mind between 1850-1950. We welcome paper and panel proposals on any aspect of British or American literature, education and/or the sciences of the mind broadly construed.This conference is part of Dr Sara Lyons’ (PI), Dr Michael Collins’ (Co-I) and Dr Fran Bigman’s (Research Associate) AHRC-funded project, Literary Culture, Meritocracy, and the Assessment of Intelligence in Britain and America, 1880-1920. The project is an investigation of how British and American novelists understood and represented intellectual ability in the period, with a particular focus on how they responded to the rise of intelligence testing and the associated concepts of I.Q. and meritocracy. For additional information, please visit our website. Possible topics include literature and:

  • Teaching and Being Taught; pedagogical theory and practice
  • Representations of Places of Learning
  • Examinations, grades, scholarships, qualifications
  • Inequality, Discrimination, and Exclusion in Education
  • Academic Success and Failure
  • Literacy and Illiteracy
  • Intellectuals, Experts, Professionalism
  • Autodidacticism, Informal Education
  • Varieties of education: aesthetic, classical, moral, religious, scientific, technical
  • Learning Styles and Types of Intelligence
  • Intellectual ability and disability

As well as literature and:

  • Professionalisation/ Institutionalisation of Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Psychometrics and personality testing
  • Physiology and psychology
  • Psychological Schools and Controversie
  • Psychology and Philosophy
  • Experimental Psychology
  • Psychiatry
  • Sexology
  • Parapsychology
  • Eugenics
  • Language and Cognition

Please submit an individual proposal of no more than 350 words or an outline for a 3 paper panel proposal by the 1 March, 2018. Papers will be limited to 20 minutes. Please include your name, a short bio, and email address in your proposal. 


​                                                                                                                                                                                    Back to top 
​                                                                                                                                                                                                            

A - L

Marginalised Histories of the Second World War
A one-day workshop (11 April 2018) hosted at King’s College, London as part of the AHRC-funded Teaching and Learning War Research Network to explore the latest research into the history, memory and representation of the Second World War (including the Holocaust) from an international comparative perspective. The event will conclude with a publicly accessible roundtable reflecting on public engagement lessons and ‘hidden histories’ as we move from the centenary of the First World War to the major anniversaries of the Second World War. Panellists include international curriculum advisors as well as representatives from historical research, the museum sector, heritage bodies, popular history publishing, and major television/radio networks. The roundtable will be chaired by Helen Weinstein, Creative Director of History Works. 

The recently published British Future A Centenary Shared report (November 2016) suggests that, during the period 2013 to 2016, the British public’s understanding of lesser known aspects of the First World War has expanded ‘globally’ taking into account the contribution made by soldiers from Australia, Canada and India and pushing understanding of the war beyond commonly held ideas of white British soldiers on the Western Front. This workshop seeks to lay foundations to consider whether the same is possible for the approaching major anniversaries of the Second World War.

This workshop seeks to bring together researchers working on topics related to the history, memory and representation of the Second World War (including the Holocaust) that go beyond well-worn Euro-centric narratives and/or researchers whose work casts light on lesser known aspects of the experiences themselves. The term ‘marginalised’ is defined broadly with reason in order to encompass the latest research dedicated to those narratives of the Second World War and the Holocaust that are usually relegated to the side notes or chapters of broader histories and/or that are not currently central to commemoration in the UK and the Commonwealth. How do these experiences relate to the imperial and global nature of the conflict? To what extent are these narratives absent from popular accounts that tell the history of the war? What narratives are marginalised and why? How does ‘peripheralisation’ compare across different national settings? Where are these narratives marginalised (e.g. in the academe, classroom, wider society?) What memory politics contributes to marginalisation? How might we close the gap between academic research into these areas and public engagement activities here in the UK and worldwide?

While not exhaustive, this list suggests topics contributions might address:
  • Indigenous and ethnic minority service in the Second World War e.g. Maori participation in the New Zealand Army; tribal groups on the Burma-India border
  • Research relating to the war in South Asia, the Caribbean, and Africa
  • Gender, sexuality and violence in the Second World War
  • Marginalised civilian groups in the UK e.g. Irish immigrants, traveller communities, juvenile delinquents, the disabled, the elderly
  • Marginalised ‘male’ experiences such as ground crew, logisticians and male civilians
  • Marginalised narratives of death, grief and bereavement
  • Technological experimentation e.g. gas mask testing in India
  • Cultural histories of Holocaust violence e.g. gendered experiences of violence; violence against children; interactions between Nazi anti-Jewish violence and other forms of ethnic violence; perpetrators and their relationship to intimate violence
  • Politicisation and utilisation of marginalised memories e.g. in regards to identity politics

While we recognise that it will not be possible to do full justice to all marginalised voices in a one-day event, the organisers felt it to be important to include new and marginalised perspectives on all aspects of and related to the Second World War, including the Holocaust as well as events such as the Bengal Famine.

The event will be structured around presentations of no more than 20 minutes, ensuring maximum time for Q&A.

While the workshop is free to attend for all, the AHRC is generously providing up to fifteen travel bursaries on a sliding scale (outside Europe £500 p.p. max. 3; Europe £350 p.p. max. 4; and within UK but outside Greater London area £100 p.p. max. 8) to ensure geographical spread of expertise. Please indicate on your abstract/in your email whether you would like to be considered for the bursary. Priority will be given to PGRs and ECRs. 

Contact Info: 
General queries and abstracts of no more than 200 words should be sent to Catriona Pennell by 30 November 2017. Please include a brief biography outlining your research expertise as well as your name, organisation/institution and contact email.

Contact Email and URL




MID-ATLANTIC CONFERENCE ON BRITISH STUDIES ANNUAL MEETING
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND
SATURDAY and SUNDAY, APRIL 7-8, 2018

The MACBS -- the mid-Atlantic affiliate of the NACBS, the main organization for British Studies in Canada and the United States – is soliciting proposals for papers and panels on all areas of British Studies for our annual conference. We welcome participation from scholars of Britain, the British Atlantic World, and the British Empire broadly defined, and we are open to proposals ranging from the ancient to the contemporary and from scholars of history, anthropology, literature, art, politics, economics and related fields. Senior faculty, junior faculty, and graduate students are all encouraged to participate.

Proposals for both individual papers and full panels are welcome. Paper proposals should include a brief (no more than 250 words) abstract of the paper and a curriculum vita. Full panel proposals should also include a one-paragraph description of the panel’s overall aim and indicate which panel member will serve as the organizer and primary contact.

All submissions must be received by 15 December 2017.

Send proposals via email to:

Prof. Nicholas Popper, Program Co-Chair
Dept. of History
College of William & Mary


Prof. Katie Hindmarch-Watson, Program Co-Chair
Dept. of History
Johns Hopkins University


Contact EmailURL



MIDWEST VICTORIAN STUDIES ASSOCIATION
VICTORIAN HEALTH & WELLNESS 

Participants in MVSA seminars will write 5-7 page papers that will be pre-circulated to the other participants prior to the conference. During the seminars, the seminar leader and participants will identify important points of intersection and divergence among the papers and identify future areas of inquiry and collaboration. The seminar format allows a larger number of scholars to participate in MVSA and to seek financial support from their respective institutions to attend the conference and discuss a shared area of scholarly interest. Seminars are limited to 12 participants. All seminar proposals should be submitted via e-mail by December 1, 2017. (See descriptions below for details.)

Alternative Approaches to Health and Wellness
Seminar Leader: Anne Stiles, Department of English, Saint Louis University 
The Victorian era witnessed watershed medical discoveries such as the advent of surgical anesthesia in the 1840s, the gradual acceptance of the germ theory of disease from the 1850s-1880s, and the widespread use of experimental research in medicine during the latter half of the nineteenth century. Despite these medical advances, however, nineteenth-century Britons and Americans turned in great numbers to alternative health care and faith-healing practices such as mesmerism, spiritualism, homeopathy, Christian Science, and New Thought. This seminar will explore alternative, occult, and faith-healing practices such as these in Victorian literature and life. We will discuss why these alternative health-care practices appealed to large numbers of people and how they catered to followers who felt dissatisfied with mainstream medicine. We will also interrogate these alternative healing movements’ fraught relationships with the science of their day. Movements such as Christian Science and spiritualism, for instance, frequently co-opted the language of science while undermining the materialist orientation of mainstream medical research. They also provided faith-based treatment alternatives for those who felt that medicine, particularly experimental physiology, challenged the role of God, the soul, or the individual will in modern life. Finally, we will discuss intersections between gender and alternative health care – for instance, why so many of the movements mentioned above appealed largely to women. We welcome papers on any aspect of alternative health care in the Victorian era, and on literary works or genres that explore such alternative treatments. Send a 300-word abstract and 1-page CV (both as MWord documents) by December 1, 2017, to Anne Stiles.

Health and Environment in the Nineteenth-Century British World
Seminar Leader: Christopher Ferguson, Department of History, Auburn University 
The nineteenth century represented a pioneering moment in the history of environmental regulation, and the British occupied a central place in this history. Industrialization and imperial expansion subjected Britons to a range of new types of physical milieus while simultaneously generating an unprecedented assault upon the natural world. This context of environmental upheaval produced some of the earliest public health, anti-pollution, and conservationist policies, and concerns about “health” – whether that of the individual, society, the nation, or the empire – were foundational both to the conceptualization and the implementation of these local, national, and imperial government programs. This seminar seeks to explore the relationship between the Victorians’ ideas about health and the environment, and the types of environmental policies and practices these ideas generated. Questions to be examined might include: How did nineteenth-century Britons conceptualize the relationship between health and environment? How were these ideas shaped by contemporary doctrines of religion, medicine, science, or political economy? What was the place of ethics in Victorian thinking about health and environment? Whose health was worthy of protection and preservation? Was the environment something to be conquered or to be lived with harmoniously? Did the Victorians postulate universal laws about the relationship between humans and the environment, or were these responsive to movements between built milieus or climates? Finally, did the Victorians’ ideas about these questions remain static for most of the century or did they evolve over time (and if so, what facilitated this evolution)? Send a 300-word abstract and 1-page vita (both as MWord documents) by December 1, 2017, to Christopher Ferguson.

In Sickness and in Health: Representing Victorian Illness
Seminar Leader: Carolyn Day, Department of History, Furman University 
In 1844, Friedrich Engels provided the following description of consumption in the working class, calling its victims “pale, lank, narrow-chested, hollow-eyed ghosts” with “languid, flabby faces, incapable of the slightest energetic expression.” Yet just a few years later, in 1849, Charlotte Brontë provided a very different portrayal stating, “Consumption, I am aware, is a flattering malady.” How is it possible for beautiful consumptives and hollow-eyed ghosts co-exist? This seminar seeks participants for an interdisciplinary discussion of the various representations of health and disease in the Victorian period. This seminar welcomes scholars interested in examining topics such as the role of gender, class, morality, and the environment in the understandings and representations of health and illness during the nineteenth century. Send a 300-word abstract and 1-page vita (both as MWord documents) by December 1, 2017, to Carolyn Day.

The Midwest Victorian Studies Association is an interdisciplinary organization welcoming scholars from all disciplines who share an interest in nineteenth-century British history, literature, and culture.  
For more information, please visit website.




CFPL The Munich Crisis and the People: International, Transnational and Comparative Perspectives
Humanities Research Institute (HRI), University of Sheffield, 29-30 June 2018

Recent events in international politics have highlighted the intricate interconnectedness between diplomatic crises and public opinion, notably public expressions of emotion. As the 80th anniversary of the Munich Crisis approaches, this conference will revisit this ‘model’ crisis and its aftermath, exploring both its lessons and its contemporary resonance. Few diplomatic incidents, before or since, have aroused such public excitement as the events of September 1938 and yet the ‘public’, the ‘people’, the ‘material’, and the ‘popular’ have hitherto been marginalised within a historiography that remains dominated by traditional ‘high’ politics perspectives, often reiterating the ‘Guilty Men’ orthodoxy. Recent incursions into the debate have made progress by experimenting with different methodologies, conceptual frameworks, and a greater plurality of sources, yet there has been a noticeable stagnation in original research. A re-evaluation is long overdue, and this conference will tap into the potential that rests in cross-disciplinary approaches and comparative frameworks. Indeed, the most neglected aspects of the crisis - despite the abundance of sources - are the social, cultural, material, and emotional, as well as public opinion. The conference will also internationalise the original ‘Munich moment’, as existing studies are overwhelmingly Anglo- and Western-centric.

Consequently, the conference will encourage contributions that assess the Munich Crisis in its broadest sense. These could include:
  • The emotional history (fear, anxiety, panic, catharsis, apathy, suicide, etc.)
  • Visual, material and linguistic representations
  • Collective versus individual responses
  • Psychoanalytic and psychological narratives of cris
  • The ‘people’ (broadly conceived) – different generations, gender, class, etc.
  • The impact of popular opinion and the media
  • The physical environment – cities in crisis; the landscape, pets & animals
  • Internationalizing the crisis (especially encouraging how it played out in Eastern Europe, the Soviet Union, Scandinavia, the United States, the Middle East, the Far East, and the imperial sphere).

Confirmed plenary speakers: Gabriel Gorodetsky, Christian Goeschel, Julie Gottlieb, Susan Grayzel, Mary Heimann, Daniel Hucker, Miklos Lojko, Andrew Preston, Michal Shapira, Richard Toye, Karina Urbach, Jessica Wardhaugh.

Proposals for papers of 20 minutes or panels of three to four speakers are invited. We are particularly keen to encourage contributions from postgraduate students, recent postdocs, and international scholars. Paper proposals should include a title, a 250-300 word abstract, and a short bio of each participant, and should be submitted to Dr Julie Gottlieb, Dr Daniel Hucker and Prof. Richard Toye. Please send these by 18 December, 2017.

With generous funding from the Max Batley Legacy to the University of Sheffield, it is anticipated that we will not need to charge a conference fee. 





​New Researchers in Maritime History Conference 2018
ss Great Britain, Bristol
6-7 April 2018
The British Commission for Maritime History, in association with the ss Great Britain Trust invites contributions to its twenty-fourth conference for new researchers. Hosted at the Great Western Dockyard in Bristol, the conference
provides a unique opportunity for new scholars to present their work in an
historic maritime setting.
The Conference supports emerging scholars who wish to share their work in a supportive environment and build relations with other maritime historians. We, encourage applications from research degree students and warmly encourage participation by independent scholars. Contributions can address all aspects of maritime history in its broadest sense.
Those wishing to offer a paper should complete the online form available here or from the website
Please direct any queries here.
The deadline is 16 February 2018
Anyone interested in attending the conference without presenting a paper is also warmly invited to register an interest: further information will be sent to you in due course. 




PCCBS ANNUAL MEETING, 23-25 MARCH 2018

SANTA BARBARA, CA

The Pacific Coast Conference on British Studies invites paper and panel proposals for its 45th Annual Meeting, to be held at UC Santa Barbara 23-25 March 2018. 

The PCCBS invites papers representing all fields of British Studies -- broadly defined to include those who study the United Kingdom, its component parts and nationalities, as well as Britain's imperial cultures. We welcome proposals from scholars and doctoral candidates in a wide range of disciplines across the humanities, social sciences, and the arts, including History, Literature, Political Science, Philosophy, Religion, Gender Studies, Cultural Studies, Theater Studies, and Art History.

Proposals for individual papers, partial panels, or complete panels are all welcome, although complete panel proposals are preferred. We encourage the submission of proposals dealing with interdisciplinary topics, as well as panels on new pedagogies and technologies associated with British Studies.

The deadline for submission of proposals is DECEMBER 1st, 2017. Proposals should include a 200-word abstract for each paper plus a one-page c.v. for each participant. Those submitting full or partial panel proposals should include a brief description of the panel plus a 1-page c.v. for the panel chair as well as for its commentator. Please place the panel proposal, its constituent paper proposals, and all vitae in a single file, making certain that your contact information, especially e-mail addresses, are correct and current. Proposals should be submitted via e-mail attachment by December 1, 2017.  

*Graduate students who have papers accepted by the program committee will be eligible to request reimbursement for some travel expenses from the Stern Trust when registering for the conference.

Contact Email, URL






Religion and the Life Cycle, 1500-1800
Deadline 26th January 2018
Queen Mary University of London, Friday 6th July 2018
The Queen Mary Centre for Religion and Literature in English (QMCRLE) welcomes proposals for twenty minute papers on the theme ‘Religion and the Life Cycle, 1500-1800’ for a one-day interdisciplinary conference. We interpret the term ‘Life Cycle’ broadly, to include biological transition points such as birth and death, social transition points such as coming of age ritual, marital and employment status, life-stages such as childhood or adolescence, and indeed the passage of time and the process of aging. This conference seeks to explore institutional religious ceremonies and prescriptions relating to the life cycle, as well as more personal and informal religious beliefs and responses. We welcome papers from all disciplines, and we especially welcome submissions from postgraduate students. Postgraduate bursaries are available. Please send abstracts of up to 300 words and a brief bio to Emily Vine by 26th January 2018.





                                                                                                                                                                Back to top

​                                                                                                                                                         
M - R
S - Z




The 20th- and 21st-Century Irish Literatures: Between Realism and Experimentation                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                












Last Updated:
 16/11/17